CDR-Zone.COM Forum Index Home | Reviews | Software | Guides | Articles | Forum

 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 
divxtodvd 0.4.8 and minimum bit rate

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CDR-Zone.COM Forum Index -> ConvertXToDVD (formerly DivXToDVD)
Author Message
lapinou
VSO Official support


Joined: 09 Nov 2003
Posts: 256

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 5:00 pm    Post subject: divxtodvd 0.4.8 and minimum bit rate Reply with quote

http://www.vso-software.fr/download_product_direct.php?product=divxtodvd if you download the version 0.4.8, there is a minimum bit rate fixed now. if some people wants to give their feedback in this thread.
Back to top
JJ
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 7:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for new version. However - for most of people this fix is NOT needed, as their players are fully DVD-standard compliant and play DivXtoDVD encoded movies fine. I like the simple fact that I can put two movies to same DVD, so filesizes are needed to be pretty small as they were. Now if you have set a minimum bitrate without possibility to turn it off, you are forcing everyone to encode movies with bigger filesize. DVD-standard does NOT require minimum bitrate, it only specifies that bitrate should be between 0 and 9000. If this is just for testing; ok, but please give us a button to turn it off. Let those who have problems use it, and let rest of us have small filesize with great picture, thank you! And while I have this begging going on, please give us a chance to use Half-D1! (screen size 352*288 PAL, 352*240 NTSC) This would be great in transferring all those home movies from VHS to DVD. Using full D1 is just a waste of space, as VHS quality is even lower than Half-D1. So in short - one button to select minimum bitrate, and two more modes to picture standard selection, now there is "PAL 25 FPS" and "NTSC 29,97 FPS", just add "PAL Half-D1 25 FPS" and "NTSC Half-D1 29,97 FPS"
Back to top
JJ
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Ok, did quick test. Same movie converted with previous version and 0.48 version. Original length: 1:24:18, 25 FPS, 576*304pixels. 950kbps videostream, 200kbps audiostream. Converted (in three parts, all with different avg bitrate) Old: 2 198 657 024 bytes, 3052/3391/2519kbps New: 2 242 803 712 bytes, 3120/3444/3003kbps If this works fine with those Panasonic/Hitachi players, then great.
Back to top
bigly
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Can you see any difference in quality JJ? Doing a then and now test too - will post results! With those 'new' file sizes it will be difficult to get some 2 movie combo's on a single DVD5.
Back to top
JJ
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 8:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No visible difference on my player. Then again, there should not be, as all that change did was padding up those lower bitrates. And yes, even difference is just 200MB, that makes about 400-500MB for two movies .. not good.
Back to top
cakka
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Wed Feb 09, 2005 11:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

jj, what you have to remember is that when you have converted from divx/xvid to dvd the end result becomes a hybid in effect, you wont ever buy a dvd film with only 1500/2000mb on the disc the end result is not (what you call) (dvd standard) the fix was needed for future development of sorts. i like how you still think panasonic/hitachi are not part of the dvd standard term as you imply. but you are entitled to your own opinions ha ha. i don't double up on converted films on a dvd disc, i put upto 5 films on a disc in divx/xvid form but my player is divx compliant. i like my quality to much, have you tried using dual layer media, i mean thats what its for and it would cure your problems, thus keeping more quality in the process. for the price of media these day's its just not worth cramming them on a single disc unless you use DL media. vso might answer to your request and add a button you never know. catch ya jj . cakka
Back to top
bigly
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:18 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sad Could be paranoid here but are technically minded people not allowed in these forums Question @PERSONS SUFFERING PROBLEM WHO HAVE TIME TO FLAME: VSO have specifically responded to your problem. I would have finished an encode, burn to DVD and test on my stand-alone in that time...that is, if I happened to have a Panasonic/Hitatchi stand-alone. Wink DOES 'THE FIX' WORK? _____________________________________________ MINIMUM BIT-RATE CHANGE ~= 20% FILE SIZE INCREASE: Over 2 different input files comparing previous version to this minimum bit-rate version I have seen an average increase in file size of 20%. Most combinations of 2 movies should still fit on a DVD5. If this fixes the problems (cakka?) for 'general use' it is worth the hit! [Gotta remember this is (an amazing quality) 'click-n-go' type app for the majority, not a dedicated configurable encoder for the minority!] ______________________________________________
cakka wrote:
you wont ever buy a dvd film with only 1500/2000mb on the disc the end result is not (what you call) (dvd standard)
True BUT most commercial DVDs have much more content in their bit-stream than you think! For example, most are anamorphic so they actually have many more lines of vertical resolution data than the actual output aspect ratio would suggest. Also, uncompressed linear sound is usually at a higher bit-rate on a commercial DVD than is available in a DivX/XviD source and there are often multiple audio streams within that "standard" commercial bit-rate. Nobody is suggesting true DVD quality as that is already comprimised by the DivX/XviD encode but it is a shame that there is 20% worth of wasted MPEG-2 encoding efficiency to satisy the needs of a %'age of users.
cakka wrote:
don't double up on converted films on a dvd disc
There is a big difference between "converted" as in transcoded and "converted" as in 2 stages of [re]encoding. Not many transcoding apps would survive if they took as long as 2 encodes to "convert" a movie. Smile The encode engine in DivXToDVD is soooo efficient, it seems it produces better quality than transcoding if the original DivX/XviD source is good (65%+). Nobody would be actually prepared to do the 2 encodes (DVD>>DivX/XviD + DivX/XviD>>DVD) but the point is the first encode is already done before we DL! SO: We can DL 2 movies (legally of course) and put them both onto a DVD5 IN COMPARIBLE QUALITY OR BETTER than if we transcoded 3hrs of 'original commericially produced DVD content' onto a DVD5. The major difference being we didn't need to touch an 'original' DVD! - Think 'bowt it Wink Thanks only to the efficiency of DivXToDVD!
Back to top
JJ
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 10:55 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
1500/2000mb on the disc the end result is not (what you call) (dvd standard) the fix was needed for future development of sorts
It is not (what I call) (dvd standard) - it is OFFICIAL DVD standard. Obviously you did not bother to read that link on my post. Here is again link, try to read it. http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html#3.4 Ok, you can't read that much technical info, here is few lines of that paragraph:
Quote:
Maximum video bit rate is 9.8 Mbps. The "average" video bit rate is around 4 Mbps but depends entirely on the length, quality, amount of audio, etc. This is a 31:1 reduction from uncompressed 124 Mbps video source (or a 25:1 reduction from 100 Mbps film source). Raw channel data is read off the disc at a constant 26.16 Mbps. After 8/16 demodulation it's down to 13.08 Mbps. After error correction the user data stream goes into the track buffer at a constant 11.08 Mbps. The track buffer feeds system stream data out at a variable rate of up to 10.08 Mbps. After system overhead, the maximum rate of combined elementary streams (audio + video + subpicture) is 10.08. MPEG-1 video rate is limited to 1.856 Mbps with a typical rate of 1.15 Mbps.
And this line from same source is quite interesting:
Quote:
Different players use different numbers of bits for the video digital-to-analog converter, wit the best-quality players using 10 or 12 bits. This has nothing to do with the MPEG decoding process, since each original component signal is limited to 8 bits per sample. More bits in the player provide more "headroom" and more signal levels during digital-to-analog conversion, which can help produce a better picture.
These two quotes clearly define how DVD players are forming picture from videostream. There are a few points where problems might occur; - track buffer, if player is not properly configured, it does not pad up buffer as needed. This would result in less information output to TV than required, producing GREEN ARTIFACTS. - bitconversion, if player is using only 8bits (or less), then it might lead to problems. This whole FAQ is good reading for everyone, it is well structured and you will find a lot of info there. At least half of "problems" in thi forums can be solved by reading that FAQ: http://www.dvddemystified.com/dvdfaq.html And then;
Quote:
you wont ever buy a dvd film with only 1500/2000mb on the disc
Of course I would and I have. I have NO need for all extras, and if you read that FAQ, you realize that actual video filesize on disk is usually 2-3GB. Rest is extras, audiotracks (up 32), subtitles, menus and all other stuff that is not needed to watch that movie. You can always fill a disk with one movie, just use CBR instead of VBR. (look up those terms if they confuse you)
Quote:
DVD video is usually encoded from digital studio master tapes to MPEG-2 format. The encoding process uses lossy compression that removes redundant information (such as areas of the picture that don't change) and information that's not readily perceptible by the human eye. The resulting video, especially when it is complex or changing quickly, may sometimes contain visual flaws, depending on the processing quality and amount of compression. At average video data rates of 3.5 to 6 Mbps (million bits/second), compression artifacts may be occasionally noticeable. Higher data rates can result in higher quality, with almost no perceptible difference from the master at rates above 6 Mbps. As MPEG compression technology improves, better quality is being achieved at lower rates.
Artifacts can occur with EVERY movie. Read carefully and you find that there are many factors causing this. One simple thing though: if encoder is causing problem, then it shows with every player.
Quote:
i don't double up on converted films on a dvd disc, i put upto 5 films on a disc in divx/xvid form but my player is divx compliant.
So is my player. I also do that. But sometimes I go visiting friends, and we have a video night. They all do not have DivX-player, so I need those movies in DVD-format.
Quote:
for the price of media these day's its just not worth cramming them on a single disc unless you use DL media
Excuse me? I can buy DVD-R or +R for as low sa 0.25€/disk, DL media 2.90€/disk. So to me it IS worth it, getting ten disks for same price as one DL.
Back to top
cakka
Newbie
Newbie


Joined: 25 Jan 2005
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 12:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

if you strip all extras-plus audio/subculture etc the move would still be over 3gb-. if you have movies with less than that then the quality would not be as good . fact) also i run my dvd player and tv through progressive scan so my viewing quality is of the highest standard, oh and just to let you know, of course i know what constant bitrate is and also variable bitrate cbr/vbr. but then i would, when i encode with (cce9/10-pass.dl) if you need to know what cce is then please ask. plus im very interested to know where you bought your dvd movies without menu's,extras,no subs etc. unless you buy screeners, then they would still be over 3gb.(proper dvd ) you see i only use divx to dvd if im really stuck, so it is important that it is right. im not one for converting from vhs to dvd, i dont see the point. but thats just me. oh, and remember i dont own the players in question but yet i showed my intrest on the subject, wihich vso has also done so after my tests are complete today i will verify if the fix has worked. and then if vso start to charge for this great little program there are less factors to worry about. im only interested in going from divx/xvid to dvd there are no size issues here, thanks vso. cakka
Back to top
JJ
Moderator
Moderator


Joined: 23 Dec 2004
Posts: 3293

PostPosted: Thu Feb 10, 2005 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
would still be over 3gb-. if you have movies with less than that then the quality would not be as good . fact)
Please back up your claim with proof. If you did read ANY of those links I provided, you would have noticed that only way to make movie to FILL DVD-5 disk is to use CBR of 8000, and then add audiotracks that use rest about 1500.
Quote:
plus im very interested to know where you bought your dvd movies without menu's,extras,no subs etc. unless you buy screeners, then they would still be over 3gb.(proper dvd )
Who said that I bought such disks? I said that I DON'T CARE for those extras. Reading is nice thing, being able to understand is another.
Quote:
i dont see the point. but thats just me.
All you need is you. All you care for is you. Ok, have fun with yourself. On this forum we are trying to help OTHERS.
Back to top
bigly
Junior Member
Junior Member


Joined: 21 Jan 2005
Posts: 53

PostPosted: Fri Feb 11, 2005 10:42 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

cakka wrote:
oh, and remember i dont own the players in question but yet i showed my intrest on the subject, wihich vso has also done so after my tests are complete today i will verify if the fix has worked.
Hey cakka, that in mind, sorry for this:
bigly wrote:
@PERSONS SUFFERING PROBLEM WHO HAVE TIME TO FLAME:Embarassed VSO have specifically responded to your problem. I would have finished an encode, burn to DVD and test on my stand-alone in that time...that is, if I happened to have a Panasonic/Hitatchi stand-alone.
BUT:
bigly wrote:
DOES 'THE FIX' WORK?
Please let use know 'cos there is no point losing 20% bit-rate efficiency if it doesn't solve the problem (green blocks).
Back to top
CDR-Zone.COM
Advertisement Bot


Posted:     Post subject: Advertisement:

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    CDR-Zone.COM Forum Index -> ConvertXToDVD (formerly DivXToDVD) All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group